As an Amazon Associate, Modded gets commissions for purchases made through links in this post.
What’s the difference between a front- and mid-engine car, and which is best for your needs? The answer varies based on who you ask, as everyone is different. Some people want a daily driver they can take to work. Others want a rugged vessel for off-road adventures.
When it comes to placement, no single layout is better than others. Still, you can learn more about front- vs. mid-engine cars and which is best for your needs.
When researching front-engine vs. mid-engine layout, the latter is the most common in today’s vehicles by a large margin. You’ll find all the vital components under the hood. Front-engine cars are more common because they allow for more room behind the front wheels — an ideal spot for storing mechanisms. As a result, these cars have flexibility when it comes to adding features.
Most cars with a front engine have front-wheel drive (FWD), like the Toyota Camry. With the wheels under the weight of the engine, FWD vehicles see improved traction in snow.
Others, like the Ford Mustang, have a front-engine and rear-wheel drive (RWD). Front-engine vehicles with RWD have a more balanced weight distribution than those with FWD, which is optimal for racing.
Most all-wheel-drive (AWD) vehicles, like the Subaru Outback, also have engines in the front. Like RWD, AWD offers improved traction control and handling in difficult terrain and adverse weather.
Pros and Cons of Front Engine Cars
You’ll discover many pros and cons of front-engine cars. Some advantages include:
These vehicles also exhibit some disadvantages, such as:
Vehicles with a mid-engine are far less common than front-engines. In this layout, the motor sits between the front and rear axles. Mid-engines typically sit closer to the front of the vehicle than the back. Most cars with this layout have the set-up directly behind the seats.
An engine between the two axles provides an even distribution of weight. You’ll typically find this engine layout in sports cars.
You’ll also find pros and cons of mid-engine cars. You can expect advantages to include:
Chevy’s new mid-engine Corvette, for example, is trying to tempt working-class buyers with a starting price of $60,000. For decades, the model used the front-engine layout, even as many sports car manufacturers made the switch. Experts believe the Corvette’s low price could push others to cost-effective innovation.
Even with these performance advantages, mid-engine cars have a few drawbacks, such as:
When it comes to front and mid-engine cars, which is best? The answer depends on why you’re driving.
Do you need a vehicle that will get from Point A to Point B, even with cargo or adverse weather? If so, opt for a mid-engine layout. One of 2019’s best models includes the Mazda 3, a compact car that promotes a blend of driving dynamics, style, reliability and safety. Another top pick is the Mini Hardtop, a fun-to-drive vehicle with an upcoming all-electric model.
Are you all about high performance? Perhaps you enjoy racing or showing off on the streets. No matter your desire — such as a twin-turbocharged V6 or a 50-horsepower electric motor — choose a car with a mid-engine set-up.
A rare find is the rear-engine setup. In Europe, you can only find three rear-engine vehicles for sale — the Renault Twingo, the Smart and the Porsche 911.
Unless your wallet is overflowing, you’ll likely have to decide between a front- and mid-engine car. One option is not superior to the other. Instead, they both offer a variety of benefits. Research which layout best fits your need before you make your next purchase.